- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:12:46 -0700
- To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 PROV-O - rhymes with "bravo!" :-) On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: > In the OWL call today we seemed to settle on PROV-O (Provenance Ontology), > since it's pronounceable and simple. Yes, it's a city name, but that hasn't > stopped other ontologies in the past. > Jim > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Given that we no longer want to call the provenance ontology "the formal >> model" we wanted another name: >> >> Here are some proposals: >> >> PROV Ontology Model (also PROV ontology) >> PROV-Onto >> PROV Vocabulary >> >> Please send your suggestion/endorsement/thoughts in on this thread. We >> will try and get consensus this week. >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Jim McCusker > Programmer Analyst > Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > Yale School of Medicine > james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 > http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > http://tw.rpi.edu >
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 21:13:23 UTC