W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model

From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:12:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMFz4jh4OfnTVyLPEtS6GiKHPUDowNeQx0j5UH9JwLRHQWvpPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
Cc: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 PROV-O - rhymes with "bravo!" :-)

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote:
> In the OWL call today we seemed to settle on PROV-O (Provenance Ontology),
> since it's pronounceable and simple. Yes, it's a city name, but that hasn't
> stopped other ontologies in the past.
> Jim
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Given that we no longer want to call the provenance ontology "the formal
>> model" we wanted another name:
>>
>> Here are some proposals:
>>
>> PROV Ontology Model (also PROV ontology)
>> PROV-Onto
>> PROV Vocabulary
>>
>> Please send your suggestion/endorsement/thoughts in on this thread. We
>> will try and get consensus this week.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jim McCusker
> Programmer Analyst
> Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
> Yale School of Medicine
> james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330
> http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu
>
> PhD Student
> Tetherless World Constellation
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> mccusj@cs.rpi.edu
> http://tw.rpi.edu
>
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 21:13:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:43 GMT