W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model

From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:51:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAtgn=SNQEzPXYZVWxQkbdDT1=qKbPj_nJNYappvyaCP-ag8SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
In the OWL call today we seemed to settle on PROV-O (Provenance Ontology),
since it's pronounceable and simple. Yes, it's a city name, but that hasn't
stopped other ontologies in the past.

Jim

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Given that we no longer want to call the provenance ontology "the formal
> model" we wanted another name:
>
> Here are some proposals:
>
> PROV Ontology Model (also PROV ontology)
> PROV-Onto
> PROV Vocabulary
>
> Please send your suggestion/endorsement/**thoughts in on this thread. We
> will try and get consensus this week.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Jim McCusker
Programmer Analyst
Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
Yale School of Medicine
james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330
http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu

PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
mccusj@cs.rpi.edu
http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 19:52:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:43 GMT