- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:21:14 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
don't mind PROV-O, although PROV-OM is more consistent with PROV-DM -Paolo On 10/10/11 10:12 PM, Eric Stephan wrote: > +1 PROV-O - rhymes with "bravo!" :-) > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jim McCusker<mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: >> In the OWL call today we seemed to settle on PROV-O (Provenance Ontology), >> since it's pronounceable and simple. Yes, it's a city name, but that hasn't >> stopped other ontologies in the past. >> Jim >> >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Groth<p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Given that we no longer want to call the provenance ontology "the formal >>> model" we wanted another name: >>> >>> Here are some proposals: >>> >>> PROV Ontology Model (also PROV ontology) >>> PROV-Onto >>> PROV Vocabulary >>> >>> Please send your suggestion/endorsement/thoughts in on this thread. We >>> will try and get consensus this week. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> >>>
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 07:21:38 UTC