W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:21:14 +0100
Message-ID: <4E93EE6A.9030103@ncl.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
don't mind PROV-O,
although PROV-OM is more consistent with PROV-DM
-Paolo


On 10/10/11 10:12 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
> +1 PROV-O - rhymes with "bravo!" :-)
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jim McCusker<mccusj@rpi.edu>  wrote:
>> In the OWL call today we seemed to settle on PROV-O (Provenance Ontology),
>> since it's pronounceable and simple. Yes, it's a city name, but that hasn't
>> stopped other ontologies in the past.
>> Jim
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Groth<p.t.groth@vu.nl>  wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Given that we no longer want to call the provenance ontology "the formal
>>> model" we wanted another name:
>>>
>>> Here are some proposals:
>>>
>>> PROV Ontology Model (also PROV ontology)
>>> PROV-Onto
>>> PROV Vocabulary
>>>
>>> Please send your suggestion/endorsement/thoughts in on this thread. We
>>> will try and get consensus this week.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 07:21:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:44 GMT