W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 16024] New: should some/all of the prose on transitioning gradients be deferred?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:32:59 +0000
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-16024-5148@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16024

           Summary: should some/all of the prose on transitioning
                    gradients be deferred?
           Product: CSS
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Transitions
        AssignedTo: dino@apple.com
        ReportedBy: dbaron@dbaron.org
         QAContact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: cmarrin@apple.com, eoconnor@apple.com, smfr@me.com


css3-transitions currently has a bit of prose on transitioning gradients.  I'm
not sure there's a whole lot of consensus around it; there have been various
suggestions on how to improve it, and I'm not aware of implementations (see,
e.g., Simon's bug 14612 comment 1 regarding WebKit).

I think we should consider deferring rules for animation of gradients to
css4-images.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 19:33:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 February 2012 19:33:01 GMT