W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 16024] should some/all of the prose on transitioning gradients be deferred?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:19:57 +0000
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1S2nC1-00037p-Sx@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16024

--- Comment #2 from Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> 2012-02-29 17:19:57 UTC ---
Is this a dup of bug 14612?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 17:20:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 February 2012 17:20:05 GMT