W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 16024] should some/all of the prose on transitioning gradients be deferred?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:33:12 +0000
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Ryq1w-0005by-4l@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16024

L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|                            |[needsresolution][easy/medi
                   |                            |um]

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 19:33:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 February 2012 19:33:13 GMT