W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 16024] should some/all of the prose on transitioning gradients be deferred?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:03:25 +0000
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RyrRF-0006Sv-2V@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16024

--- Comment #1 from Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> 2012-02-18 21:03:24 UTC ---
Maybe css4-images should handle it. I agree that it should be deferred.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 21:03:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 February 2012 21:03:26 GMT