W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 16024] should some/all of the prose on transitioning gradients be deferred?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:07:52 +0000
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Rzw08-0006uG-DP@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16024

L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|[needsresolution][easy/medi |[needsresolution][easy]
                   |um]                         |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 20:07:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 February 2012 20:07:58 GMT