W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:14:08 +0100
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <frdq1d$hco$1@ger.gmane.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:

> as Brian observed, IRI->URI mapping is not sufficient if you need 
> to *exactly* reconstruct the original IRI (such as when the IRI
> is used as a name, e.g. an Atom link relation).

I think he also observed that Latin-1 IRIs are not much, it gives
you 96 additional codepoints u+00A0 up to u+00FF to play with in
HTTP header fields.

The wonders of chapter 5 in RFC 3987 are IMO no 2616bis problem´.

Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 12:12:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:45 UTC