- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:14:08 +0100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > as Brian observed, IRI->URI mapping is not sufficient if you need > to *exactly* reconstruct the original IRI (such as when the IRI > is used as a name, e.g. an Atom link relation). I think he also observed that Latin-1 IRIs are not much, it gives you 96 additional codepoints u+00A0 up to u+00FF to play with in HTTP header fields. The wonders of chapter 5 in RFC 3987 are IMO no 2616bis problem´. Frank
Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 12:12:13 UTC