W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:26:48 +0900
Message-Id: <>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org

At 19:26 08/03/14, Julian Reschke wrote:
>Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Personally, I am *very* -1 on doing this.
>> Changing the allowable characters in a protocol element is a *big* change, and there is not an interoperability gain to doing so.
>> There is also not a functionality gain; it is possible (if not pretty) to serialise other characters into HTTP headers.
>I think the key question here: is that implemented in practice? (In particular, which encoding?) If yes, fine (and maybe let's document what works). But if not...?

Exactly. I'm still waiting for somebody to point to a server that
actually serves iso-8859-1 data, or even more, RFC 2045-encoded

Regards,   Martin.

#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 03:57:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:45 UTC