- From: Anders Berglund <alrb@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 15:29:55 -0400
- To: xsl-editors@w3.org
The 1.0 behaviour has been "reinstated" by restricting the sources in a flow-assignment to be either all fo:flows or all fo:static-content. This restriction was inadvertently left out when writing up multiple flows. Anders >The editors, > >The behaviour of the above classes of static-content in the draft 1.1 >Recommendation of 16 December 2004 has not changed, as far as I could >see, from the 1.0 Recommendation. > >There are some problems that are peculiar to these flows. In XSL 1.0, >the combination of implicit flow-map, uniqueness of region-name within a >simple-page-master and the uniqueness of flow-names guarantees, if I am >not mistaken, that any given region on a given page will be the target >of at most one flow, be it fo:flow or fo:static-content. In combination >with the method of determining the dimensions of the region-body and the >extents of the "border" regions, this ensures that the layout available >to the fo:flow does not have to be adjusted depending on the contents of >any fo:static-region. > >If retrieve-markers occurs in xsl-footnote-separator or >xsl-before-float-separator, however, they directly impact the space >available for the layout of fo:flow. > >This situation is different from that pertaining to >fo:retrieve-table-marker, which more closely parallels the treatment of >footnotes than that of marker retrieval in that the fo context is >contained entirely within the fo:flow. > >The draft and the Recommendation provide for ad hoc restrictions on a) >whether a conditional area is generated at all if there is insufficient >space in the main-reference-area, and b) on the total b-p-d space that a >conditional area can occupy. These clauses do not seem to apply to the >separators in isolation. > >If a survey of implementations revealed that marker retrieval was not >implemented within xsl-before-float-separator & xsl-footnote-separator >static-content, would there be any interest within the working group in >constraining such static-content to exclude fo:retrieve-marker? > >Yours faithfully, >-- >Peter B. West <http://cv.pbw.id.au/> >Project Folio <http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/>
Received on Friday, 6 May 2005 19:30:02 UTC