Re: Migration to Codeberg

Not sure if you're already aware of this one but the links to the 
ancillary files are broken from here: 
https://spec.xproc.org/main/xproc/#ancillary-files

Sheila

On 24/04/2026 17:45, Sheila Thomson wrote:
> Hi Norm,
>
> Thanks for doing the migration.  I'm not sure if this problem is 
> specific to me or general to everyone but when I try to search the 
> Issues list, no matches are found.  I've tried testing it with the a 
> few words that i know to be in at least one issue, for example: 
> "document", "with-input".
>
> Sheila
>
> On 03/04/2026 16:02, Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote:
>> Hello world,
>>
>> I think the migration is finished. I expect that we’ll find rough 
>> edges and things that have been overlooked, but it seems to be working.
>>
>> * https://codeberg.org/XProc/specification holds the core and step 
>> specifications, and the grammar.
>>
>> * I’ve ported over all the issues with as much provenance as is 
>> practical. Instead of having separate repositories, we have labels to 
>> distinguish between different kinds of issues. There are pros and 
>> cons to the different approaches, but I think we can work with this.
>>
>> * https://codeberg.org/XProc/test-suite holds the test suite
>>
>> * Build automation is in place. It’s perhaps not as smooth and tidy 
>> as GitHub actions, but it works. The status quo and PR drafts are 
>> published automatically on https://spec.xproc.org/
>>
>> I’m going to update the GitHub repositories to point to the new ones.
>>
>> And I might try writing a couple of PRs for some easy things just to 
>> whet everyone’s appetite.
>>
>>                                          Be seeing you,
>>                                            norm
>>
>> -- 
>> Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
>> https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/
>>
>>> The cure for writer's cramp is writer's block.--Inigo DeLeon
>

Received on Friday, 24 April 2026 23:43:52 UTC