- From: Sheila Thomson <discuss@bluegumtree.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 17:45:43 +0100
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
Hi Norm, Thanks for doing the migration. I'm not sure if this problem is specific to me or general to everyone but when I try to search the Issues list, no matches are found. I've tried testing it with the a few words that i know to be in at least one issue, for example: "document", "with-input". Sheila On 03/04/2026 16:02, Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote: > Hello world, > > I think the migration is finished. I expect that we’ll find rough edges and things that have been overlooked, but it seems to be working. > > * https://codeberg.org/XProc/specification holds the core and step specifications, and the grammar. > > * I’ve ported over all the issues with as much provenance as is practical. Instead of having separate repositories, we have labels to distinguish between different kinds of issues. There are pros and cons to the different approaches, but I think we can work with this. > > * https://codeberg.org/XProc/test-suite holds the test suite > > * Build automation is in place. It’s perhaps not as smooth and tidy as GitHub actions, but it works. The status quo and PR drafts are published automatically on https://spec.xproc.org/ > > I’m going to update the GitHub repositories to point to the new ones. > > And I might try writing a couple of PRs for some easy things just to whet everyone’s appetite. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> > https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/ > >> The cure for writer's cramp is writer's block.--Inigo DeLeon
Received on Friday, 24 April 2026 16:45:55 UTC