- From: Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex <gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:20:00 +0200
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
Another difference might result from oXygen using Saxon EE by default while Calabash uses Saxon HE. But I haven’t recently seen huge performance differences between HE and EE in typical transformation scenarios. On 27.06.2020 16:12, Norman Tovey-Walsh wrote: > Robert Stuart <bobstuart@mac.com> writes: >> I run a simple pipeline to run 3 xsl on 10 files from inside Oxygen and it takes ~9 seconds. >> I run the same from the command line using >> java -cp ../BuildDependencies/xmlcalabash-1.2.1-99/*.jar com.xmlcalabash.drivers.Main test.xpl >> and it takes ~51 seconds >> >> Is this expected for some reason? Do I have something not “right”? > > How long does Oxygen take to start up on your machine? The only > practical difference between those two should be the JVM startup tax. If > you’re of a mind to experiment a little, you could try configuring the > pipeline to run in piperack[1] which would also mitigate the JVM startup > overhead. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > [1] https://xmlcalabash.com/docs/reference/piperack.html >
Received on Saturday, 27 June 2020 14:20:23 UTC