Re: PipX, a portable library of XProc pipelines and steps

Here's an equivalent xprocspec test:
https://github.com/fgeorges/pipx/pull/1/files

xprocspec depends on calabash for its cx:eval.


Jostein


On 20 February 2014 15:33, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> wrote:

> On 20 February 2014 09:01, Romain Deltour wrote:
>
> >>  4/ a unit test suite, for simple tests
>
> > Have you considered using XProcSpec ?
> > http://daisy-consortium.github.io/xprocspec/
>
>   Thank you for making me realize that I wasted time on this one :-)
> Actually I looked for it but could not find it again, so assumed it
> was not public.  At first glance, I like the definition of the
> language, but I think it lacks examples.  As an example, what would be
> for example the equivalent in XProcSpec of [1] ?  Basically it tests
> the following:
>
>     <pipx:parameter param-name="foo">
>        <p:with-param name="foo" select="'bar'"/>
>     </pipx:parameter>
>       --> <param name="foo">bar</param>
>
>     <pipx:parameter param-name="foo" required="true">
>        <p:with-param name="foo" select="'bar'"/>
>     </pipx:parameter>
>       --> <param name="foo">bar</param>
>
>     <pipx:parameter param-name="foo" required="true">
>        <p:input port="parameters">
>           <p:empty/>
>        </p:input>
>     </pipx:parameter>
>       --> error pipx:no-parameter
>
>   How is it implemented?  Is it platform-independent?  Like
> implemented with XProc only?
>
> >>  2/ to document precisely each step in the sources using
> >>     p:documentation
> >>  3/ a simple documentation generation for the website (using
> >>     documentation from 2/)
>
>   Do you know if anything exists to generate API documentation based
> on a p:library and its p:documentation elements? (at least for step
> declarations)
>
>   Regards,
>
> --
> Florent Georges
> http://fgeorges.org/
> http://h2oconsulting.be/
>
> [1]https://github.com/fgeorges/pipx/blob/master/test/pipx-parameter.xml
>