- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:10:11 +0100
- To: Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@gmail.com>
- Cc: Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>, "Geert J." <geert.josten@dayon.nl>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On 20 February 2014 18:46, Jostein Austvik Jacobsen wrote:
> Here's an equivalent xprocspec test:
> https://github.com/fgeorges/pipx/pull/1/files
Thanks. I accepted your pull request, I'll have a look later. Can
you explain how to run it? At first glance, I would say it is a bit
verbose, and it has the same drawback (someone would say advantage) as
XSpec has: it allows you only to execute one step, not a subpipeline.
What if you want to test for instance:
<pipx:step-a .../>
<pipx:step-b .../>
instead of just calling either pipx:step-a or pipx:step-b?
I will try to update http://pipx.org/progress.html soon also, but
for now, I have to call it a day...
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 18:11:01 UTC