- From: QuiXProc XProc <quixproc@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:47:02 +0100
- To: Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>
- Cc: Conal Tuohy <conal.tuohy@versi.edu.au>, xproc-dev@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 17 November 2012 11:47:31 UTC
Great ! We're looking forward for your feedback W.r.t. to you point on coverage please look at http://tests.xproc.org/results/quixproc/ The QuiXProc Team On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>wrote: > That is good news. Last time I looked QuiXProc was still a rebuilt based > on some version of Calabash, this sounds like a large step forward. > > > > I’m going to put it on the top of my nice-things-to-look-at list.. J > > > > Cheers > > > > *Van:* innovimax@gmail.com [mailto:innovimax@gmail.com] *Namens *QuiXProc > XProc > *Verzonden:* woensdag 14 november 2012 20:45 > *Aan:* Geert Josten > *CC:* Conal Tuohy; xproc-dev@w3.org > > *Onderwerp:* Re: Memory problem with sequences in Calabash > > > > > > Hi Geert, > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl> > wrote: > > Hi Conal, > > Quixproc might work as well, but not sure how well it covers the standard, > nor whether it has any of the nice extensions Calabash provides, in case > you are using any.. > > > > QuiXProc is a rewrapping of Calabash 1.0.2-94 including parallel > processing and streaming > > > > So in the worst case it can do exactly what Calabash can do. > > > > In best cases, it can handle more memory because of streaming > > > > Hope this helps > > > > QuiXProc Team >
Received on Saturday, 17 November 2012 11:47:31 UTC