- From: Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:58:04 +0100
- To: QuiXProc XProc <quixproc@gmail.com>
- Cc: Conal Tuohy <conal.tuohy@versi.edu.au>, xproc-dev@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 11:58:27 UTC
That is good news. Last time I looked QuiXProc was still a rebuilt based on some version of Calabash, this sounds like a large step forward. I’m going to put it on the top of my nice-things-to-look-at list.. J Cheers *Van:* innovimax@gmail.com [mailto:innovimax@gmail.com] *Namens *QuiXProc XProc *Verzonden:* woensdag 14 november 2012 20:45 *Aan:* Geert Josten *CC:* Conal Tuohy; xproc-dev@w3.org *Onderwerp:* Re: Memory problem with sequences in Calabash Hi Geert, On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl> wrote: Hi Conal, Quixproc might work as well, but not sure how well it covers the standard, nor whether it has any of the nice extensions Calabash provides, in case you are using any.. QuiXProc is a rewrapping of Calabash 1.0.2-94 including parallel processing and streaming So in the worst case it can do exactly what Calabash can do. In best cases, it can handle more memory because of streaming Hope this helps QuiXProc Team
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 11:58:27 UTC