Re: xsl:message support


On 5/20/2012 7:30 AM, Xmlizerwrote:
> Why not using xsl:result-document and create a sequence that you could
> get out of the p:xslt step ?

That's more or less what I meant by this:

>     We may end up dropping our messages in as XML and then filtering
>     them into a separate "warnings" pipe. I imagine this is being done a
>     fair amount: is it more or less the recommendation when developers
>     want to use xsl:message to emit runtime warnings? Are there other
>     ideas I have missed?


Wendell Piez                  
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.      
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
   Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML

Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 16:54:48 UTC