- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 22:00:58 +0200
- To: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On 20 May 2012 12:57, mozer wrote:
Hi,
> RuntimeValue is needed here for a very good reason : if the String
> you are providing is in fact a QName, you also need to provide the
> namespaces binding to allow it's handling
3 points here: 1/ a string is a string, whatever way you generate it
(e.g. by serializing a QName), but I suspect this is rather because
Calabash supports the "general values" extension, 2/ RuntimeValue has
actually a ctor RuntimeValue(String) that I missed (or that was added
since?), so actually I can just use new RuntimeValue("value"), and
finally 3/ I don't know why, but I had to use passOption() rather than
setOption(), but the difference between both is rather obscure to me.
Just for the records...
Thanks for your response! Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/
Received on Sunday, 20 May 2012 20:01:47 UTC