- From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:14:56 +0000
- To: Conal Tuohy <conal.tuohy@versi.edu.au>
- Cc: vojtech.toman@emc.com, xproc-dev@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 11:15:31 UTC
Personally I wouldn't want to have to state "these pipelines can execute in parallel". As a programmer I want to focus on what are the logical dependencies between my pipelines, and any given pipeline processor can work out for itself whether or not it can execute them in parallel. *I agree with your statements the only thought that comes to mind is when a new developer comes on board in a company with pipelines that are say 50% extension functions and he has no idea which ones are running in parallel and well I don't know,, would it be obvious what was happening or be documentation dependent?* *<**p:parallel> perhaps like a p:group but tells you something relevant about the relationship between two steps or is the lack of specification of a port or the specification of a port easier? Dumb idea? (What is the emoticon for a positive non-rhetorical questions ;)?? ***
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 11:15:31 UTC