- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:57:37 +0200
- To: Tobias Vogt <tobias_vogt_@web.de>
- Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
I guess the question is, can't we augment the algorithm > its trivial either way to implement and I don't see any confusion allowing such. ta, J On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Tobias Vogt <tobias_vogt_@web.de> wrote: > James Fuller wrote: >> >> consider this trivial pipeline > >> <p:declare-step xmlns:foo="http://acme.com/test" > > xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc"> >> >> <p:input port="source"/> >> <p:output port="result"/> >> <p:input port="extra" primary="false"/> > >> <p:identity/> > >> </p:declare-step> > >> as I understand things the source and result should be marked primary > > automatically[...] > > I believe Calabash is correct to not mark the "source" port as primary. > According to the spec: > "[Definition: If a step has a document input port which is explicitly > marked “primary='true'”, or if it has exactly one document input port > and that port is /not/ explicitly marked “primary='false'”, then that > input port is the /primary input port/ of the step.]" > > In your pipeline, you have defined more than one input port, none of > which is marked primary="true", so the condition stated above is not met. > > Tobias > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 08:58:16 UTC