- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:43:47 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m2ljobgb0c.fsf@nwalsh.com>
James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes:
>> <p:declare-step type="cxf:info">
>> <p:declare-step type="cxf:touch">
>> <p:declare-step type="cxf:tempfile">
>> <p:declare-step type="cxf:delete">
>> <p:declare-step type="cxf:mkdir">
>> <p:declare-step type="cxf:copy">
>> <p:declare-step type="cxf:move">
>
> cool, could we add a fail-on-error option which is set to true by
> default on all the steps, but could be overridden if different
> behavior is desired.
We could. But do you really want to ignore failure for any of these?
> also any thoughts on ?
>
> cfx:head
> cfx:tail
They're sort of tricky wrt XML.
                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm
-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As the old hermit of Prague, that never
http://nwalsh.com/            | saw pen and ink, very wittily said to
                              | the niece of King Gorboduc, 'That that
                              | is, is'.-- Shakespeare
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 16:44:30 UTC