- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:43:47 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m2ljobgb0c.fsf@nwalsh.com>
James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes: >> <p:declare-step type="cxf:info"> >> <p:declare-step type="cxf:touch"> >> <p:declare-step type="cxf:tempfile"> >> <p:declare-step type="cxf:delete"> >> <p:declare-step type="cxf:mkdir"> >> <p:declare-step type="cxf:copy"> >> <p:declare-step type="cxf:move"> > > cool, could we add a fail-on-error option which is set to true by > default on all the steps, but could be overridden if different > behavior is desired. We could. But do you really want to ignore failure for any of these? > also any thoughts on ? > > cfx:head > cfx:tail They're sort of tricky wrt XML. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As the old hermit of Prague, that never http://nwalsh.com/ | saw pen and ink, very wittily said to | the niece of King Gorboduc, 'That that | is, is'.-- Shakespeare
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 16:44:30 UTC