xproc-dev@w3.org from February 2009 by date

Saturday, 28 February 2009

• base URI after select= in p:input, p:identity David A. Lee

Thursday, 26 February 2009

• Re: Report document generated by 'validate-with-schematron' is not well-formed XML Inigo Surguy
• Re: Report document generated by 'validate-with-schematron' is not well-formed XML Inigo Surguy

Friday, 27 February 2009

• Which is more efficient in the pipe, a whole feed or a sequence of entries? Philip Fennell
• Having trouble with Calabash 0.9.4 and http-request Philip Fennell

Thursday, 26 February 2009

• RE: Report document generated by 'validate-with-schematron' is not well-formed XML Philip Fennell
• Report document generated by 'validate-with-schematron' is not well-formed XML Philip Fennell

Saturday, 21 February 2009

• ANN: XProc Tutorial Costello, Roger L.

Friday, 20 February 2009

• [ANN] XML Prague 2009 March 21-22, only one month to go ... register now James Fuller

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

• Re: Extension function prefixes/namespace David A. Lee

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

• Re: XProc test http-request-005 Florent Georges
• RE: XProc test http-request-005 Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

Saturday, 7 February 2009

• Extension function prefixes/namespace David A. Lee

Thursday, 5 February 2009

• Calabash 0.9.4 and p:http-request; response content conversion Florent Georges
• Re: [closed] Re: p:http-request's send-authorization use case? Florent Georges
• Re: [closed] Re: p:http-request's send-authorization use case? Florent Georges
• Re: [closed] Re: p:http-request's send-authorization use case? mozer
• Re: Wrong CRLF in http-request-006 on tests.xproc.org Florent Georges
• Re: Content-Type of http-request-007 on tests.xproc.org Florent Georges
• RE: Wrong CRLF in http-request-006 on tests.xproc.org Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• RE: Content-Type of http-request-007 on tests.xproc.org Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• Wrong CRLF in http-request-006 on tests.xproc.org Florent Georges
• Content-Type of http-request-007 on tests.xproc.org Florent Georges
• [closed] Re: p:http-request's send-authorization use case? Norman Walsh
• Re: [closed] Re: security. Is this implementable? Dave Pawson
• [closed] Re: Extension XPathExpressions in step arguments - 2.7 XPath Extension Functions Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: xml-add- base and relative Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: Calabash. p:step-available Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: add-attribute adding namespace declarations. Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: security. Is this implementable? Norman Walsh
• Re: XProc test http-request-005 Florent Georges
• Re: Calabash, pass in the stylesheet path on command line? Steve Whitlatch

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

• XProc test http-request-005 Florent Georges
• Re: Calabash, pass in the stylesheet path on command line? Norman Walsh
• Re: Expected results of http-request-005 Norman Walsh
• Re: Expected results of http-request-005 Florent Georges
• Re: http-request: error content Florent Georges
• Calabash, pass in the stylesheet path on command line? Steve Whitlatch
• Re: [closed] Re: calabash: p:identity with multiple inline mozer
• Announce: XML Calabash 0.9.4 Norman Walsh
• RE: http-request: error content Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

• p:http-request: error content Florent Georges
• RE: Expected results of http-request-005 Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• [closed] Re: instance name visible within a custom step? Norman Walsh
• Re: Expected results of http-request-005 Norman Walsh

Monday, 2 February 2009

• Expected results of http-request-005 Norman Walsh

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 13:51:58 UTC