- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:59:40 -0500
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 00:00:25 UTC
Has anyone else attempted to pass the http-request-005 test? http://tests.xproc.org/tests/required/http-request-005.xml Having now rewritten the Calabash code that decodes multipart MIME messages, I'm confident that the expected results are incorrect. You can test this yourself by cutting out the base64 encoded lines of the second part and decoding them. The result is not a valid PNG file. In case you think you're passing that test :-), my guess is that my old code was (incorrectly) interpreting the byte stream of the image as UTF-8. I must have assumed I got it right and used my earlier output as the expected result. My bad. If no one disagrees, I'm going to correct the expected results of http-request-005. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | What good is a can of worms if you http://nwalsh.com/ | never open it?--Bob Arning
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 00:00:25 UTC