- From: James Garriss <james@garriss.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:56:26 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C5029A8A.AA9%james@garriss.org>
using Calabash 0.6.2:
I'm using the code Norm Walsh sent out earlier to determine if an xml doc is
valid or not (thank you, Norm!), and I'm getting an unexpected result.
Here's the pipeline:
<p:declare-step xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc"
xmlns:px="www.garriss.org">
<p:input port="source">
<p:document href="BookStore.xml"/>
</p:input>
<p:output port="result">
<p:empty/> <!-- note the empty binding -->
</p:output>
<p:declare-step xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step"
type="px:is-valid" name="is-valid">
<p:input port="source" primary="true"/>
<p:input port="schema" sequence="true"/>
<p:output port="result"/>
<p:option name="mode" select="'strict'"/>
<p:try>
<!-- all of Norm's cool code snipped from right here -->
</p:try>
</p:declare-step>
<px:is-valid name="step1">
<p:input port="schema">
<p:document href="BookStore.xsd"/>
</p:input>
</px:is-valid>
</p:declare-step>
The result output port of the (outer) p:declare-step is bound to p:empty.
So I should expect the output of running this pipeline to be empty, right?
Well, it's not. The result of the px:is-valid step has escaped! I'm
getting this:
<c:result xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step"
xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc"
xmlns:px="www.garriss.org">true</c:result>
#1) Is that a bug in a) my pipeline, b) my thinking, c) Calabash, d) all of
the above, e) none of the above?
#2) Is it proper terminology to call the inner p:declare-step a
subpipeline? I think so.
You guys continue to be super-helpful, thank you so much!
James Garriss
http://garriss.blogspot.com
Received on Friday, 26 September 2008 17:57:08 UTC