- From: James Garriss <james@garriss.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:56:39 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 26 September 2008 15:57:24 UTC
From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> James Garriss <james@garriss.org> writes: > So we can't bind an input port in the declaration. Can we bind one when we > specify (use) it? IOW, is this legal pipeline code? Yes. In fact, *all* inputs must be bound when you *use* a step. If you don't specify a primary input/output port, it'll get bound automatically. All *primary* output ports must also be bound (implicitly or explicitly) when you use a step. Output ports that aren't primary can be left unbound, in which case any data that flows throw them "falls on the floor" (i.e. gets silently discarded). Very helpful, thank you! --J
Received on Friday, 26 September 2008 15:57:24 UTC