- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:40:10 +0000
- To: "James Sulak" <jsulak@gmail.com>, xproc-dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2008/12/7 James Sulak <jsulak@gmail.com>: > According to the definition of p:output (5.4): > > "If a binding is provided for a p:output, documents are read from that > binding and those documents form the output that is written to the > output port. In other words, placing a p:document inside a p:output > causes the processor to read that document and provide it on the > output port. It does not cause the processor to write the output to > that document." > > So that's why it doesn't work. But as to how to make it work, I'm not > sure yet. I was trying to use it as the inverse of p:input... i.e. specifying the output file I wanted as the child of p:document! I can see some logic in your interpretation... that matches the p:input logic though it seems unreasonable to do it that way, I hope you are wrong James! regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 7 December 2008 14:40:46 UTC