- From: Denis Zawada <deno@deno.pl>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:50:00 +0200
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
On Saturday 18 of June 2011 13:35:59 Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Perhaps "parent" simpleType is the appropriate term?
>
> In my LotteryNumbers example, would it be appropriate to say that the
> OneToNintyNine simpleType is the "parent" simpleType of LotteryNumbers?
>
> /Roger
OneToNinetyNine restricts http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#positiveInteger
LotteryNumbers = List<OneToNinetyNine>
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#positiveInteger
{mylottery}OneToNinetyNine
List<?>
LotteryNumbers = List<OneToNinetyNine>
LotteryNumbers (anonymous restriction)
LotteryNumbers is a restriction for a container, but the container itself does
not subclass its items.
To illustrate, lets define each step explicitly:
<xs:simpleType name="LotteryNumbers">
<xs:list itemType="OneToNinetyNine"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="LuckyLotteryNumbers">
<xs:restriction base="LotteryNumbers">
<xs:length value="6" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
Then you can clearly see that the inheritance chain is as follows:
List<?>
LotteryNumbers = List<OneToNinetyNine>
LuckyLotteryNumbers
This has also practical implications. For example in LuckyLotteryNumbers
restriction you only can restrict properties that you inherit from a ‘list’,
however you can't redefine any properties that are inherent to
OneToNinetyNine.
Hope this helps,
Denis Zawada
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 00:11:21 UTC