- From: Denis Zawada <deno@deno.pl>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:50:00 +0200
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
On Saturday 18 of June 2011 13:35:59 Costello, Roger L. wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Perhaps "parent" simpleType is the appropriate term? > > In my LotteryNumbers example, would it be appropriate to say that the > OneToNintyNine simpleType is the "parent" simpleType of LotteryNumbers? > > /Roger OneToNinetyNine restricts http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#positiveInteger LotteryNumbers = List<OneToNinetyNine> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#positiveInteger {mylottery}OneToNinetyNine List<?> LotteryNumbers = List<OneToNinetyNine> LotteryNumbers (anonymous restriction) LotteryNumbers is a restriction for a container, but the container itself does not subclass its items. To illustrate, lets define each step explicitly: <xs:simpleType name="LotteryNumbers"> <xs:list itemType="OneToNinetyNine"/> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="LuckyLotteryNumbers"> <xs:restriction base="LotteryNumbers"> <xs:length value="6" /> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> Then you can clearly see that the inheritance chain is as follows: List<?> LotteryNumbers = List<OneToNinetyNine> LuckyLotteryNumbers This has also practical implications. For example in LuckyLotteryNumbers restriction you only can restrict properties that you inherit from a ‘list’, however you can't redefine any properties that are inherent to OneToNinetyNine. Hope this helps, Denis Zawada
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 00:11:21 UTC