- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:39:38 +0100
- To: "Tsao, Scott" <scott.tsao@boeing.com>
- Cc: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tsao, Scott writes:
> Thanks very much for your suggestions!
>
> Is http: URI that same as URL?
Many people use 'URL' to mean 'URI using the http: scheme', yes.
> And, is the use of them for namespace names (in lieu of URN)
> recommended by standards organizations such as W3C and OASIS?
Absolutely. OASIS have backed off using URNs as namespace names, and
W3C TAG strongly recommends using http: URIs for this purpose.
> The committee (we are participating in) seems to think that we
> should register a formal URN namespace for "global" uses like OASIS
> and S1000D have done [1], because that would allow us to use this
> unique namespace as part of our schema namespace structure for
> different schemas in different specifications.
Why doesn't the same apply for e.g. http://[your committee]/namespaces/xxx?
Which has the additional benefit that as I mentioned before, you can
document your namespace at that URI...
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFKnj1akjnJixAXWBoRAgpnAJ946RWeMWRT4NA3S1hHT0bCc63GPgCcDCJp
3NNY0Glqx4E0BJeWcEZs0z8=
=zpxU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 09:40:33 UTC