- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:41:06 -0700
- To: Bharath Kumar Reddy T <bharathkr@huawei.com>
- Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org, ranjit@huawei.com, ashutosh_p@huawei.com
On 17 Feb 2009, at 03:14 , Bharath Kumar Reddy T wrote: > Hi.. > > The following schema is non deterministic since the parser will not > determine whether it should compare the element in the instance > document with 1st element declaration or 2nd element declaration. > ... > For the following schema also same scenario is present. But one of > the xml Parsers is not giving any error. Can any body tell me > whether the following schema is non-deterministic or not? No, it's not non-deterministic. If your type 'derived' were an extension rather than a restriction of type 'base', I think you'd have a case of non-determinism; was there a typo in your example? -- **************************************************************** * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen * http://www.blackmesatech.com * http://cmsmcq.com/mib * http://balisage.net ****************************************************************
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 19:41:46 UTC