- From: Dieter Menne <dieter.menne@menne-biomed.de>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
info-1588 wrote: > > > but, if I do understand it well, this means that you have two different > (versions of the) schemas, with the same namespace, and different > (although > slightly different) content. > > This is something, just from a principal point of view, I do not like. > My principle is "new standard (version) => new schema (version) => new > namespace". > > Point taken and I even was aware of it, but lost in namespace, so to say. Will think it over. info-1588 wrote: > > In your case, I would definitely opt for writing a schematron (which is a > good excercise anyway). ;-) > I am no longer sure if that is a good idea. Michael Kay already mentioned that in my case I do not want to validate data, but schemas. I want different schemas for hospital admins and researchers, so that some stacked series of schemas would be able to qualify the file as public, research, hospital. Dieter -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Conditional-Levels-of-a-Schema-tp22905179p22930935.html Sent from the w3.org - xmlschema-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:53:55 UTC