- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:19:06 +0000
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
On 18/03/2008, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote: > If a complex type is empty, then no child elements are allowed. But if the > mixed=true, then you are still allowed text nodes, comments, and processing > instructions as children; What's the best way to model "element with text content and attributes"? For example: <foo bar="b" baz="b"> only text allowed </foo> I've used this before, but it seems bulky: <xs:complexType name="foo"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:string"> <xs:attribute name="bar" type="xs:string"/> <xs:attribute name="baz" type="xs:string"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> This thread has suggested you can do this: <xs:complexType name="foo" mixed="true"> <xs:attribute name="bar" type="xs:string"/> <xs:attribute name="baz" type="xs:string"/> </xs:complexType> Is that right? If so, is that shorthand for the above? thanks -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 11:19:41 UTC