W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2008

Re: Why do we have 'Schema Component Constraint: Element Declarations Consistent'

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:01:19 +0100
To: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bfxr013f4.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This isn't really an answer, but it's a different way of stating the
constraint, in terms of an invariant that it guarantees:

 the signature of an EII or AII determines its type

where by 'signature' I mean the path from the root.

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIY9lvkjnJixAXWBoRAglOAJ9zQj3pO1G78VtLx/mOSK2vEka5tgCgg1bD
N3eAlMIrqLC2El1zymDXl1Q=
=n2Mq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:02:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:47 UTC