- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:27:56 -0000
- To: "'Eliot Kimber'" <ekimber@reallysi.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> > It goes without saying that I've very disappointed the > xs:override proposal as pushed off for 1.1--that would have > made things so much easier. But I certainly understand the > pressures that require those sorts of hard decisions to be > made. I, and the entire DITA community, certainly appreciate > the effort made in putting the proposal forward. Since the specification of xs:override is essentially to include a transformed schema document, isn't it something that could be implemented in a preprocessor? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 16:28:02 UTC