- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:30:08 +0100
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: "Marie Bilde Rasmussen" <mariebilderas@gmail.com>, "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, "Virginia Wiswell" <vwiswell@verizon.net>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
noah_mendelsohn writes:
> UPA "Advantages":
> a) makes it easier for database-mapping, programming language binding,
> user-interface generation tools, etc. to statically determine what a
> schema will and won't accept. In certain respects, UPA restricts schemas
> to things that are relatively easier to bind than what you get without
> UPA.
> b) makes it easier to apply the deterministic validation algorithms, such
> as those that were used in many XML 1.0 validators
c) It makes the worst-case time complexity of subsumption checking
between two content models linear (as opposed to exponential).
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHFxmRkjnJixAXWBoRAqAPAJ9TFdGhqzabCSM3O0i/HNdl0eD/+ACfdJXz
QoJNF4/+HieyRxSrNXL3dHQ=
=eCRi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2007 08:31:34 UTC