- From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:08:37 +0200
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: Marie Bilde Rasmussen <mariebilderas@gmail.com>, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, Virginia Wiswell <vwiswell@verizon.net>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> writes: > BTW: don't infer from the length of the above lists that I'm against > UPA; I've been in favor of it, and it's sufficiently important to > our database implementors among others that I remain in favor. I've also noticed that people who struggle with UPA are invariably trying to create vocabularies which, while may be more suitable for human consumption, are hard to handle in software due to overloading of the same markup for multiple purposes. I also have a feeling that the upcoming assertion mechanism will make it easier for people to create such vocabularies. Boris -- Boris Kolpackov Code Synthesis Tools CC http://www.codesynthesis.com Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 20:25:46 UTC