- From: Wang, Zhuo <zhuo.wang@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:07:06 +0800
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Cc: "Moog, Thomas H" <thomas.h.moog@intel.com>
- Message-ID: <7B2CABB47D5B094AAACC8A1E001B82F522812E@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com>
I see :-) I’m very appreciated your exact explanation! The group reference is inside the complexType which limits the particle element “ul”. So, the reference not belongs to the particles inside the group. -Wang Zhuo ________________________________ From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@saxonica.com] Sent: 2007年3月8日 18:00 To: Wang, Zhuo; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Cc: Moog, Thomas H Subject: RE: question about group circle definition The reason is that the group reference is not "within the model group at any depth", because it's in a different complexType: <xsd:group name="ul"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="ul"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xsd:element name="li" /> <xsd:group ref="ul" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> </xsd:choice> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:group> The constraint is on the schema component model, not the XML representation, and the schema component model is the same as if it had been written: <xsd:group name="ul"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="ul" type="anonZZZ"/> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:group> <xsd:complexType name="anonZZZ"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xsd:element name="li" /> <xsd:group ref="ul" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> </xsd:choice> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> which makes it clear that the group does not actually contain a reference to itself. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ ________________________________ From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Wang, Zhuo Sent: 08 March 2007 08:39 To: Michael Kay; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Cc: Moog, Thomas H Subject: RE: question about group circle definition The case is: /xmlschema2006-11-06/msData/particles/particlesZ010.xsd Thanks, -Wang Zhuo ________________________________ From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@saxonica.com] Sent: 2007年3月8日 16:38 To: Wang, Zhuo; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Cc: Moog, Thomas H Subject: RE: question about group circle definition Could you give the name of the test case please? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ ________________________________ From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Wang, Zhuo Sent: 08 March 2007 01:31 To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Cc: Moog, Thomas H Subject: question about group circle definition Hi All, I meet a case in w3c test suite: <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xsd:complexType name="a"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:group ref="ul" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> <xsd:group name="ul"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="ul"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xsd:element name="li" /> <xsd:group ref="ul" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> </xsd:choice> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:group> </xsd:schema> I think this case voilate: 3.8.6 Constraints on Model Group Schema Components All model groups (see Model Groups (¡ì3.8)) must satisfy the following constraints. Schema Component Constraint: Model Group Correct All of the following must be true: 2 Circular groups are disallowed. That is, within the {particles} of a group there must not be at any depth a particle whose {term} is the group itself. However, many schema validators say it is a valid case. Somebody knows the reason? Thanks, - Wang Zhuo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Intel Asia-Pacific R&D Ltd. No. 880 ZiXing Road, ZiZhu Science Park, Shanghai, PRC, 200241 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 10:07:21 UTC