- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:00:43 -0000
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
I've been looking at a published schema that uses an abstract type in a
substitution group. i.e. something like:
<xs:complexType name='abstractType' abstract='true'>
<xs:sequence/>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:element name='myElement' type='abstractType'
substitutionGroup='sgroup'/>
To me this seems invalid. Or do substitutionGroups have special permission
to use abstract types?
Thanks for any help,
Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
for XML to C++ data binding visit
http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
(or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
=============================================
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 12:01:06 UTC