- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:00:43 -0000
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
I've been looking at a published schema that uses an abstract type in a substitution group. i.e. something like: <xs:complexType name='abstractType' abstract='true'> <xs:sequence/> </xs:complexType> <xs:element name='myElement' type='abstractType' substitutionGroup='sgroup'/> To me this seems invalid. Or do substitutionGroups have special permission to use abstract types? Thanks for any help, Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) =============================================
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 12:01:06 UTC