- From: Fortuno, Adam <Adam.Fortuno@Metavante.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:34:23 -0400
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 15:04:56 UTC
All, This is more of a philosophical question rather than a technical question. I have a vocabulary that my company uses to express mortgage transactions. As we look to move into consumer lending, this vocabulary isn't sufficient. We don't have the markup needed to express different types of collateral or unsecured lending. It leaves us with two options: (1) build upon the existing vocabulary to handle the new subject matter or (2) develop a new vocabulary to handle the new subject matter. Consumer lending is different enough from mortgage lending that I would prefer to develop a new vocabulary to handle it. However, other believe strongly we should modify the existing schema. Has anyone else grappled with this sort of question? Can you offer any advice based on your experiences? In what cases, does it make sense to make separate vocabularies rather than one huge one? A-
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 15:04:56 UTC