- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:51:20 +0100
- To: "Bruno Chatel" <bcha@chadocs.net>
- Cc: "Oancea Adrian" <adi_oancea@yahoo.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruno Chatel writes:
> That is effectivly a way to solve the problem.. But of course, there
> are more than a single "root" schema. There is a need to factorize
> declarations in sub-modules (ops-exch, ops-shared). In the project,
> there are 19 root schemas using 26 sub-schemas (directly or
> indirectly included). Then, if a resolve this by writting 19
> compiled root schemas, it breaks the modularity and lead risks of
> errors for evolutions.
Implementing xs:include and/or changing to a conformant validator are
surely both easier and more sensible in the long run!
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEgDRIkjnJixAXWBoRAjF7AKCDZT26P2cyeKi0gVBWZ9mFdjsG2QCeMjVd
oy7IocsPRigjGIZ47ViJH9c=
=IycR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 12:51:27 UTC