- From: oknam park <ponda7777@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:46:00 +0000
- To: ponda7777@hotmail.com, mike@saxonica.com, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
I'm still waiting for your help. Thanks a lot, Best regards, Oknam Park >From: "oknam park" <ponda7777@hotmail.com> >To: mike@saxonica.com, xmlschema-dev@w3.org >Subject: RE: Schema Help >Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:04:21 +0000 > >Here they are. > >Thanks, >Oknam > > >>From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> >>To: "'oknam park'" <ponda7777@hotmail.com>,<xmlschema-dev@w3.org> >>Subject: RE: Schema Help >>Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:02:10 -0000 >> >>Sorry, but gemq still contains these lines which make it impossible to >>validate your schema: >> >> <xs:import namespace="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >>schemaLocation="dc.xsd"/> >> <xs:import namespace="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/" >>schemaLocation="dcmitype.xsd"/> >> <xs:import namespace="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" >>schemaLocation="dcterms.xsd"/> >> >>Michael Kay >>http://www.saxonica.com/ >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: oknam park [mailto:ponda7777@hotmail.com] >> > Sent: 28 January 2006 21:54 >> > To: mike@saxonica.com; xmlschema-dev@w3.org >> > Subject: RE: Schema Help >> > >> > So, I revised gemp. and uploaded again. >> > >> > I really need your help. ^^ >> > >> > >> > >From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> >> > >To: "'oknam park'" <ponda7777@hotmail.com>,<xmlschema-dev@w3.org> >> > >Subject: RE: Schema Help >> > >Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 08:59:17 -0000 >> > > >> > > >> > >gemq contains references to schemas that you haven't >> > provided, so I can't >> > >help you with this. >> > > >> > >Michael Kay >> > >http://www.saxonica.com/ >> > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org >> > > > [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of oknam park >> > > > Sent: 27 January 2006 22:53 >> > > > To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org >> > > > Subject: Schema Help >> > > > >> > > > I developed a xml schema for a set of element and a set of >> > > > qualifiers as >> > > > well as application profile. >> > > > >> > > > Seems that Schemas for element and qualifier do not have any >> > > > problem. But, a >> > > > schema for an application profile is against validation. >> > > > >> > > > I have no idea about this. >> > > > >> > > > Could you give me a tip? Here are attached files. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks a lot, >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Oknam >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > ><< dc.xsd >> ><< dcterms.xsd >> ><< dcmitype.xsd >>
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:46:09 UTC