- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:50:26 +0000
- To: "Jack Lindsey" <tuquenukem@hotmail.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org, chandrashekarrvt@gmail.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jack Lindsey writes:
> Why was [XPath in Identity Constraints] so restricted and is that a
> good thing in your opinion?
>
> I mean it is not very orthogonal when compared to XPointer, XSLT,
> XQuery and Schematron.
The decision was based, IIRC, on a desire to minimize complexity, both
for readers and for implementors.
There was a particular concern to ensure that a streaming schema
validator could be built, something which a richer XPath subset would
have precluded.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD0MBykjnJixAXWBoRAu0sAJ9Ngt0BSSSqpLaTp7phvCH9oTSMwQCdERlk
s5hA3ZplTgcyL2/yM6oyL9U=
=qAPd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 10:50:40 UTC