- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:54:19 +0000
- To: Dan Vint <dvint@dvint.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dan Vint writes:
> Can someone explain these two constructs and any advantage or
> disadvantage to using one over the other?
As such they have the same validation semantics. The extension
version can include attribute declarations.
> I see that one seems to allow extension where the other limits me to
> restriction, but I believe even with the extension definition, I could
> not extend my Type by adding additional attributes.
^^^
Typo? You can extend _either_ of these types to get a complex type
defn with simple content and attributes.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDxidLkjnJixAXWBoRAtBdAJ4r8EPKu4YcSDG33agEdvpXjwpNigCdEsy1
I1IaVIMcHcf0gWxhPbiKWco=
=Mr/s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 09:54:27 UTC