- From: <Ken_Gross@Countrywide.Com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:55:53 -0800
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9242F738.46F4C4FC-ON88256FC4.005CAA5D-88256FC4.005D01E5@countrywide.com>
In the following example, there are two representations of an unbounded sequence of elements in "ReportOptionsModel". Is the first representation ever justified? If it is, when should it be used? ----------------------------------------- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <w3cSchema:schema xmlns:StandardType="http://www.countrywide.com/SMTG/XMLSchema/StandardType" xmlns:TransactionClass="http://www.countrywide.com/SMTG/XMLSchema/TransactionClass" xmlns:w3cSchema="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:AIRulesServiceRunModel="http://www.countrywide.com/SMTG/XMLSchema/AIRulesServiceRunModel" targetNamespace="http://www.countrywide.com/SMTG/XMLSchema/AIRulesServiceRunModel" elementFormDefault="unqualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <w3cSchema:complexType name="ReportOptionsModel1"> <w3cSchema:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded"> <w3cSchema:element name="Filter"/> </w3cSchema:sequence> </w3cSchema:complexType> <w3cSchema:complexType name="ReportOptionsModel2"> <w3cSchema:sequence> <w3cSchema:element name="Filter" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </w3cSchema:sequence> </w3cSchema:complexType> </w3cSchema:schema>
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 16:56:38 UTC