- From: <Ken_Gross@Countrywide.Com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:55:53 -0800
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9242F738.46F4C4FC-ON88256FC4.005CAA5D-88256FC4.005D01E5@countrywide.com>
In the following example, there are two representations of an unbounded
sequence of elements in "ReportOptionsModel". Is the first
representation ever justified? If it is, when should it be used?
-----------------------------------------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<w3cSchema:schema
xmlns:StandardType="http://www.countrywide.com/SMTG/XMLSchema/StandardType"
xmlns:TransactionClass="http://www.countrywide.com/SMTG/XMLSchema/TransactionClass"
xmlns:w3cSchema="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:AIRulesServiceRunModel="http://www.countrywide.com/SMTG/XMLSchema/AIRulesServiceRunModel"
targetNamespace="http://www.countrywide.com/SMTG/XMLSchema/AIRulesServiceRunModel"
elementFormDefault="unqualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
<w3cSchema:complexType name="ReportOptionsModel1">
<w3cSchema:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">
<w3cSchema:element name="Filter"/>
</w3cSchema:sequence>
</w3cSchema:complexType>
<w3cSchema:complexType name="ReportOptionsModel2">
<w3cSchema:sequence>
<w3cSchema:element name="Filter"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</w3cSchema:sequence>
</w3cSchema:complexType>
</w3cSchema:schema>
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 16:56:38 UTC