- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:03:42 +0100
- To: <lists@jeffrafter.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> Well, I know I have to be wrong being on the opposite side of an > argument from the likes of Simon and Michael, but I still disagree. I > think that the <redefine> facility maps very cleanly on to > the old DTD > practice of redefining items in the internal subset. That doesn't sound like much of a justification. Why would I want to define a set of rules that documents must conform to, and then allow the author of a document to modify those rules for his particular document? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Sunday, 10 July 2005 08:03:55 UTC