- From: Jack Lindsey <tuquenukem@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:32:41 -0500
- To: mike@saxonica.com, lists@jeffrafter.com, nwh@aber.ac.uk
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Does that also explain (in some manner not obvious to me) why an attribute in an xs:field cannot be namespace prefixed, i.e. globally defined attributes cannot be used for this purpose? e.g. This is OK: <xs:key name="KeyClientById"> <xs:selector xpath="my:Clients/my:Client"/> <xs:field xpath="@clientId"/> </xs:key> But this is not: <xs:key name="KeyClientById"> <xs:selector xpath="my:Clients/my:Client"/> <xs:field xpath="my:@clientId"/> </xs:key> Just curious - not trying to fight it! Jack >From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> >To: <lists@jeffrafter.com>, "'Nigel Hardy'" <nwh@aber.ac.uk> >CC: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> >Subject: RE: Use of key/keyref - any best practices? warnings? >Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:28:58 -0000 > > > > Agreed. Except that I think it feels wrong because nothing > > else in the > > spec works this way. QNames are already present in other > > locations, why > > does the default namespace not apply to the XPath steps in > > content? No > > don't answer that... I know I know... it's just that it > > *should* work :) > >XSLT 1.0/XPath 1.0 decided that when QNames appeared in attribute content, >they would behave like attribute names - that is, the default namespace >would not apply; but when XML Schema 1.0 introduced namespaces in their >content, they decided they would behave like elements - the default >namespace *would* apply. So where you have both conventions in the same XML >document, it is indeed confusing. > >We do try to coordinate, honest! > >Michael Kay >http://www.saxonica.com/ > > > _________________________________________________________________ Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen Technology http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.
Received on Monday, 28 February 2005 02:33:49 UTC