- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:14:43 +0000
- To: Bryan Rasmussen <brs@itst.dk>
- Cc: "'George Cristian Bina'" <george@oxygenxml.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
I'm not sure I follow. text nodes and element values are not the same thing, you're mixing the XPath data model and the XML Infoset (and how W3C XML Schema uses the Infoset). Consider your example <tag><hi> </hi><hi></hi><hi/></tag> The starting point for validation for all simple types is the *initial value* of the element or attribute information item in question [1]: [T]he *initial value* of an element information item is the string composed of, in order, the [character code] of each character information item in the [children] of that element information item. So in your example we get one string with two characters and two strings with no characters (the empty string). The second and third 'hi' elements in your example are treated identically, _because they are identical at the Infoset level_. Are you suggesting that the empty string is not a string, or rather that it should not have been a member of xs:string? I think that would violate many more expectations than including it, as the REC does. Or are you suggesting that the Infoset is wrong in failing to distinguish the second and third 'hi' elements above? ht [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#key-iv -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 17:14:47 UTC