- From: <Farid.Mahini@L-3com.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:27:37 -0400
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi,
I am getting the following error when I attempt to set the schema of an
instance of schemaFactory (J2SE 1.5.0). I created the schema using XMLSpy
and it did validate my XML source file.
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: src-resolve.4.2: Error resolving component
'trueFalse'. It was detected that 'trueFalse' is in namespace 'c:\vistaTec',
but components from this namespace are not referenceable from schema
document
'file:///C:/Development/eclipse/workspace/TecParser/TecMeasurements_revC.xsd
'.
Since the simpleType ' trueFalse' is defined in the same schema file where
it gets used, I am assuming there are in the same namespace since
'c:\vistaTec' is also the default namespace. I am getting the same error
for every element/simpleType/complexType referenced in the root element of
this schema. For illustration purpose, I removed all but the following
from the schema file (TecMeasurements_revC.xsd) and still get the same
error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- edited with XMLSpy v2005 sp2 U (http://www.altova.com) by farid mahini
(L3 Communications - TE) -->
<xs:schema xmlns="c:\vistaTec" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:fmTec="c:\vistaTec" targetNamespace="c:\vistaTec"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<xs:simpleType name="trueFalse">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:enumeration value="true"/>
<xs:enumeration value="false"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:element name="tec">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="test" type="trueFalse"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:string" use="required"/>
<xs:attribute name="version" type="xs:string" use="required"/>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
Thank you,
-Farid
>From E-mail Administrator
ATTENTION PLEASE: Do you have our new e-mail addresses?
The current L-3 standard is First.Last @ L-3com.com
E-mail addressed to First.Last @ te.L-3com.com will no longer be delivered.
Please update your address book using the "From" address on this email.
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 13:44:40 UTC