- From: <Farid.Mahini@L-3com.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:27:37 -0400
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi, I am getting the following error when I attempt to set the schema of an instance of schemaFactory (J2SE 1.5.0). I created the schema using XMLSpy and it did validate my XML source file. org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: src-resolve.4.2: Error resolving component 'trueFalse'. It was detected that 'trueFalse' is in namespace 'c:\vistaTec', but components from this namespace are not referenceable from schema document 'file:///C:/Development/eclipse/workspace/TecParser/TecMeasurements_revC.xsd '. Since the simpleType ' trueFalse' is defined in the same schema file where it gets used, I am assuming there are in the same namespace since 'c:\vistaTec' is also the default namespace. I am getting the same error for every element/simpleType/complexType referenced in the root element of this schema. For illustration purpose, I removed all but the following from the schema file (TecMeasurements_revC.xsd) and still get the same error. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!-- edited with XMLSpy v2005 sp2 U (http://www.altova.com) by farid mahini (L3 Communications - TE) --> <xs:schema xmlns="c:\vistaTec" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:fmTec="c:\vistaTec" targetNamespace="c:\vistaTec" elementFormDefault="qualified"> <xs:simpleType name="trueFalse"> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> <xs:enumeration value="true"/> <xs:enumeration value="false"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:element name="tec"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="test" type="trueFalse"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:string" use="required"/> <xs:attribute name="version" type="xs:string" use="required"/> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> </xs:schema> Thank you, -Farid >From E-mail Administrator ATTENTION PLEASE: Do you have our new e-mail addresses? The current L-3 standard is First.Last @ L-3com.com E-mail addressed to First.Last @ te.L-3com.com will no longer be delivered. Please update your address book using the "From" address on this email.
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 13:44:40 UTC