W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > September 2004

Union example incorrect?

From: Radu Preotiuc-Pietro <radup@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:14:50 -0700
Message-ID: <4B2B4C417991364996F035E1EE39E2E101A05DA1@uskiex01.amer.bea.com>
To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

I was looking at XMLSchema Part 2: Datatypes, section datatypes, http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#union-datatypes), second example.
It seems to me that the part
should be invalid as per [1] because "xsd:string" is not validly derived from the anonymous union type according to the rules in [2]. I understand that [2], rule 2.2.4, specifies that in the case of an union type B, a type D can be validly derived from B if validly derived from any of the members of the union, but in this case it's the other way around, the union members are validly derived from "xsd:string".
Is this example in error or is there something that I'm missing?


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cvc-elt
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cos-st-derived-ok
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 00:17:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:24 UTC